Regenerate Our Culture

Sunday, 2 Jul 2006

First Look at Initiatives

By Andy Nevis

Yesterday California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson finalized the list of ballot propositions on the November ballot and assigned numbers to each. Below is a short description of each one, followed by my initial position. As we get closer to the election, I will expound on most of these, I’m sure:

Proposition 1A: Requires gas tax revenue to be spent for projects to relieve traffic congestion. Leaning Yes

Proposition 1B: Nearly $20 Billion bond for construction and other transportation projects (This and items 1C, 1D, and 1E, are part of Governor Schwarzenegger’s bond package). Undecided.

Proposition 1C: A $2.9 Billion bond for affordable housing and related projects. No

Proposition 1D: $10.5 Billion general obligation bond for education and school projects. Leaning No.

Proposition 1E: Nearly $4.1 Billion for flood control projects and disaster preparedness. Leaning Yes.

Proposition 83: Would prohibit sex offenders from residing near schools or other places children might gather. Also requires offenders to wear a GPS device for life. Yes

Proposition 84: Authorizes $5.4 Billion in bonds for safe drinking water and natural resource protection (This is not part of the Governor’s bond package). Leaning No.

Proposition 85: Requires parents of minors receiving an abortion to be notified prior to the procedure, except in case of a judicial waiver. Definite Yes.

Proposition 86: Would raise cigarette taxes by $2.60 per pack to fund various health programs. No

Proposition 87: Assesses tax of 1.5%-6.0% on oil producers in order to pay for research into alternative methods. Companies would be prohibited to pass cost on to consumers. Definite No.

Proposition 88: Establishes $50 parcel tax on most pieces of property to boost education funding. No

Proposition 89: Raises taxes on corporations and financial institutions 0.2% to establish voluntary public campaign funding for candidates. No

Proposition 90: Bars state and local governments from condemning or damaging private property to promote other private projects. Yes


TrackBack URI

Comments are closed.