Tuesday, 6 Jun 2006
By Katelyn Sills
Since I have been interacting recently with bloggers of diverse political beliefs and ideologies, I thought this would be of interest. “the Catalogue For Philanthropy recently released their 2004 Generosity Index with some rather stunning findings. What this directory of non-profit organizations does every year is compare the average adjusted gross income of each state to the average itemized charitable deduction, and derive a ranking based upon the differences in these statistics.
According to their calculations, for the eighth year in a row, Mississippi is the most generous state in our nation, followed by Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Alabama — all red states that Mr. Bush won by an average margin of 25%. In fact, the top 25 most philanthropic states according to this study all voted for Mr. Bush. This means that all the states that Mr. Kerry won in November fall into the bottom half of charitable contributions as related to income in our nation. Moreover, the worst seven states in this study also all voted for Mr. Kerry, including number 49 (Massachusetts), which Mr. Kerry won by a comfortable 25% margin. ”
Coincidence?

April 18th, 2007 at 3:57 am
iono…who have more money is what ur saying?
April 18th, 2007 at 4:04 am
i take that back, its compared with gross income…hmmm…
how about:
Who voted for Bush. Rich people who care more, or rich people who care less?
i think the one with “more” wins.
BUT
…why would this have an influence on who wins election???….
i guess if the rich people are more generous, AND vote certain people, then the poor people think thats a good candidate to choose from?!?!? =)
what about,…who did these rich people who cares, vote for?
does this blog suggests that in a KERRY STATE, those rich people voted for Kerry???
this blog is quite nice=), i learned some stats. now to return to my history hw.